Huntsman v. First National Bank of El Paso
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— This is an appeal by the defendant from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial. The action was brought to collect a promissory note given to plaintiff by defendant and others. The defendant in his answer admitted its execution, but claimed that it was without consideration as far as he was concerned; that it was usurious, and that his signature thereto was obtained by plaintiff through fraud and deceit. The case was tried before a jury upon the last issue; the other two issues being by the court held to be without any support in the evidence. The grounds of the motion for new trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Morgan v. J. W. Robinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Citizens' State Bk.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State of Arizona v. Robert FischerArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Southern Arizona Freight Lines, Ltd. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.