Legal Opinion
Van Schaick v. Cronin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
This action is one of many brought by the Superintendent of Insurance, as liquidator of the Equitable Casualty *183and Surety Company, against its officers and directors to compel them to account for their official acts and to recover a judgment for damages sustained by the corporation as a result of the waste, malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance which caused the insolvency of the corporation. Defendant Cohen was one of the directors of the corporation.
In the second defense the three-year Statute of Limitations provided in subdivision 4 of section 49 of the Civil Practice Act is set up. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hun v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cassidy v. . UhlmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hanna v. . LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Loughman v. PitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Broderick v. HorvattNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Kaufman v. Investors SyndicateNew York Supreme Court · 1933