Legal Opinion
Loughman v. Pitz
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 2, 1941No. Civil No. 568PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order granting the defendants Edward A. Muller and Henry W. Muller, judgment on the pleadings dismissing said complaint as to said two defendants, upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof and upon the plaintiff’s bill of particulars dated April 9, 1940, and plaintiff’s supplemental bill of particulars dated June 14, 1940, that the said alleged claim and cause of action against the said defendants Edward A. Muller and Henry W. Muller are barred by the Statute of Limitations of the State of New York, Section 49, Subdivision 4, New York…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- United States v. Glenn Jones, Trustee of the Independent Plow, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943