Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Bixler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1957No. Docket 54, Calender 47,030PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVoelker, J.

Plaintiff below sued for the wrongful conversion of money and had a jury verdict for $6,000 against the defendant. Judgment was entered on this verdict. The trial judge then denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was grounded upon an alleged election of remedies, waiver," estoppel and res judi-cata. Later the defendant filed a motion for a hew trial. After arguments on that motion the court below, apparently on its own motion, thereupon set aside the judgment it had entered for plaintiff and entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Calhoun EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Cole v. Findley Tool & Die Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Schultz v. NickelMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Fitzgerald v. BixlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Holder v. DormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Fitzgerald v. BixlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fitzgerald v. BixlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API