Legal Opinion
Image Marketing v. Florence Television
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 31, 2003No. 1020395PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On December 14, 1999, Image Marketing, Inc. (hereinafter "IM"), sued Florence Television, L.L.C., and Valley Television, L.L.C., as well as other named and fictitiously named parties in the Lauderdale Circuit Court. The controversy stems from a television show IM produced, entitled "Cooper Company" (hereinafter "the show"), which, based on several contractual agreements, Florence and Valley agreed to air on a television station they operated in Lauderdale County.
In its original complaint, IM sought an injunction, a declaratory judgment, and remedies established by § 43(a) of the Lanham Act,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murray v. ArchamboCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Rudd v. RuddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- James W. Hoover v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, an Alabama Corporation, Usx Corporation, a Delaware Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Ex Parte Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (u.S.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- S.A.M. v. M.H.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Fielder v. ChandlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- N.M. v. K.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.