City of Birmingham v. City of Fairfield
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an amended final judgment which, in addition to rendering judgment in favor of appellant, City of Birmingham (Birmingham), taxed costs one-half to each party. Appellant Birmingham now challenges the cost allocation. We affirm.
In a prior appeal by Birmingham, this case was reversed and remanded to the circuit court by our ruling of August 31, 1979 (reported at 375 So.2d 438). Upon remand, Birmingham filed a motion to retax costs and sought additional relief. The trial judge granted the motion, and in the final judgment he taxed all costs against the City of Fairfield…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Arnold Schildhaus v. Kenneth W. Moe, as District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Beatrice Silk v. Hilary SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Judie W. McDowell v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Insurance Mgt. & Admin. v. Palomar Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Wheeler v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.