Legal Opinion
Murray v. Archambo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1998No. 97-7028PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Curtis L. Murray appeals from the district court’s minute order granting two separate motions to dismiss in favor of defendants, and closing the case. On October 31, 1996, Murray filed suit against defendants, alleging constitutional violations based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After some confusion with regard to a scheduling conference, the four individually named defendants (hereinafter Individual Defendants) responded to the complaint on December 10, 1996. On January 7, 1997, Murray filed an amended complaint. That same day, the parties attended a scheduling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arlan G. Reynoldson v. Duane ShillingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- King v. DoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Evelyn Hancock v. City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mobley v. MccormickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Murray v. City of TahlequahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- May v. SegoviaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Grynberg v. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.