Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Barnes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1978No. 1265, SC 25423PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused, Mr. Barnes, a deputy district attorney for Lane County, was accused of unethical conduct in connection with his work as prosecutor. The Trial Board, composed of three attorneys, found Mr. Barnes did not engage in any unethical conduct. A panel of the Disciplinary Review Board, consisting of three attorneys and one lay person, believed the case presented "an extremely close question,” but found Mr. Barnes had engaged in unethical conduct.

The facts are not in dispute. Mr. Barnes, an experienced prosecutor, was assigned to prosecute David Jones for forcible rape in circuit court.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Roberts Myrtlewood Factory, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In re ErsoffOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. SimmelinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API