Legal Opinion

Wilber Nat. Bank of Oneonta v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1935No. 210PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

July 1, 1927, James Patrick Mahar applied to the United States Veterans’ Bureau for reinstatement of $5,000 insurance upon his life, and with the application sent check for $13.90. The allocation of this sum then suggested by him gives no indication that he thought it sufficient to meet any premium due after August 1st.

September 19, a policy in the usual form issued and was delivered. It showed payment of the monthly premium—$3.95—due July 1st, and that like payment would be necessary on the first of each succeeding month. Also:

"... . This policy takes effect on the first day of July,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API