Legal Opinion
Smialek v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 4, 1981No. 1206 and 1241PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
Appellant, Smialek, commenced this action against Chrysler Motors Corporation, North Hills Passavant Hospital (hereinafter Passavant) and Donald Drewel to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by his now deceased wife as a result of an automobile accident and treatment following it. A verdict was rendered in favor of Mr. Smialek and against Passavant and Donald Drewel. The jury found no liability on the part of Chrysler. Post-trial motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict filed by Mr. Smialek and Passavant were denied and these appeals, now…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Foley v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pirches v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.