Foley v. Clark Equipment Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal we are called upon to examine the role of negligence concepts in tort cases where strict liability has been asserted because of a product which, allegedly, was defectively designed. Specifically at issue are jury instructions in which the trial court emphasized the importance of purging negligence concepts from the determination of design defectiveness in an action brought under the theory of strict products liability. The trial court charged the jury that the inattention of the plaintiff and the inattention of the operator of a forklift truck could not be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Majdic v. Cincinnati MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Griggs v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Brandimarti v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.