Legal Opinion
Consolidated Delta Smelt Cases
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 27, 2010No. 2:09-cr-00407PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST IMPLEMENTATION OF RPA COMPONENT 2 (a/k/a Action 3) (Doc. 433)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority (the “Authority”) and Westlands Water District (“Westlands”), move for a preliminary injunction (“PI”) against the implementation of Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (“RPA”) Component 2 set forth in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) December 15, 2008 Biological Opinion, which addresses the impacts of the coordinated…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- The Consolidated Delta Smelt CasesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.