Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this case, Plaintiffs Desert Survivors, Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians, and Western Watersheds Project challenge: 1) the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service" or "FWS") to withdraw the proposed listing of the Bi-State Sage-Grouse as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 - 1544 ; and 2) the Service's "Final Policy on Interpretation of the Phrase 'Significant Portion of its Range' in the Endangered Species Act" (the "SPR Policy"). Presently before the Court are…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. JewellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Friends of Animals v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019