Legal Opinion
The Consolidated Delta Smelt Cases
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 31, 2011No. 2:09-cr-00407PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST IMPLEMENTATION OF RPA COMPONENT 3 (Action 4) (Doc. 900)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs State Water Contractors (“SWC”), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD” or “Metropolitan”), Kern County Water Agency (“KCWA”) and Coalition for a Sustainable Delta (“Coalition”), San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority (the “Authority”) and Westlands Water District (“West-lands”) (collectively herein “Plaintiffs”), seek an injunction prohibiting the implementation of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014