Legal Opinion
Spraytex, Inc. v. Djs&t and Homax Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 1996No. 96-1172PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Spraytex, Inc. moves to dismiss DJS&T and Homax Corporation’s (Homax) appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Homax opposes.
BACKGROUND
In March 1995, Spraytex filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of Ho-max’s United States Patent 4,310,095 (the ’095 patent). 1 Homax counterclaimed for (1) a declaratory judgment that the Spraytex product was covered by the parties’ license agreement, (2) a declaratory judgment that Spraytex was in default for failure to pay royalties and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Donald R. Huene and Annette S. Huene v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Raymond F. Ringwald, Sr. v. R. D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Advey v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., and Lpl Technologies, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Ultra-Precision Manufacturing Limited v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Hanner v. METRO BANK AND PROTECT. LIFE INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.