Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1937No. Civ. S. C. 40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

It is shown by the findings, which are not questioned, that plaintiff, owner by assignment of a negotiable promissory note for $1,000, bearing an endorsement to her, endorsed the same generally after its maturity and delivered it to American Mortgage Company, as her agent, for the purpose of collection. The agent, in violation of its instructions, sold the note to McCabe-Fewell & Co., who sold it to State Guaranty Corporation, from whom defendant acquired it for a consideration of $275. Plaintiff had no knowledge of these transfers, and defendant had no knowledge of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. GroverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chase v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Woodsum v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. McPherson v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stiles v. BodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Rabbit v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Mann v. LeaskoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Gribble v. MauerhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API