Legal Opinion

Estate of Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1938No. Civ. 6098PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Walter V. Pierce died leaving a will naming L. B. Pierce, a brother, as executor, wherein he devised and bequeathed all of his estate, except two minor bequests, to Walter Phylipps Pierce, an adopted son, and his five brothers.

During the course of the probate proceedings Walter Phylipps Pierce, the adopted son, disappeared and was never located, and in the matter of Walter Phylipps Pierce, a missing person, L. B. Pierce was appointed trustee. Walter Phylipps Pierce had became indebted in a considerable sum and a creditor began suit against him and recovered a judgment for approximately $800.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bruguiere v. BruguiereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. In re Estate of WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Berardi v. Ohio Turnpike Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Estate of LuckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Veitch v. EricksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API