Bruguiere v. Bruguiere
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Black & Clark, and Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff began this action against the defendant for permanent support and maintenance. The court below sustained a demurrer to her complaint and thereupon gave judgment for the defendant from which plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff and defendant intermarried in Reno, Nevada, on December 20, 1902. They were both residents of San Francisco at that time and had gone to Nevada solely for the purpose of having such marriage ceremony performed. They immediately returned to San Francisco, where they lived together until July 24, 1904. In the meantime the child Peder S. Bruguiere, Jr., was born…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mohler v. Estate of ShankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Arthur v. IsraelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Marvin v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Chapman v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.