Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1977No. 76-1313PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Hamilton appeals from an order denying his “Motion and Petition to Vacate Conviction and Sentence” submitted alternatively under Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., and 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.
On October 18,1972, in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, petitioner pleaded guilty to conspiring to import a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 960 and 963. On December 11, he was sentenced to imprisonment for three years with parole eligibility to be determined pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4208(a)(2). At the time of plea and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Frank E. Bachner v. United States of America, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Frank E. BachnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. Edmund Tanios EliasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Joseph Del Vecchio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. John Francis RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William Michael FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.