Legal Opinion
United States v. Edmund Tanios Elias
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1991No. 90-2230PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
I. Background
Defendant-appellant Edmund Elias appeals a district court denial of his motions to withdraw a guilty plea and the imposition of sentence. On appeal, Elias argues the district court erred because his plea was not made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently. He also argues the court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Michael CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Colette Joe BernaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joseph v. Libretti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.