Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Insurance Co. of North America

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1991No. D010952PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

Insurance Company of North America (INA), surety on a licensed motor vehicle dealer’s bond, appeals a money judgment entered against it after a trial by the court sitting without a jury. The court’s ruling against INA was on the theory it breached its duty to both claimants and principals on the bond to act in good faith on a bond claim, including a duty of paying claims as they arose and reasonably investigating claims regarding the question of coverage and the question of the obligation to pay. The judgment runs in favor of Conrad Schmitt and Charles Sackett (sometimes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Airlines Reporting Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Washington International Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API