Breitung v. Lindauer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. Assumpsit under Comp. L., § 3858. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
This action was brought to charge the ■defendant, plaintiff in error, for an indebtedness of the Michigan Iron Company, contracted while the defendant was a director thereof, because the directors of such corporation had failed to file certain reports as required by a general law of the State, relating to mining and manufacturing corporations.
A brief statement of facts will better enable us to comprehend the several questions raised in this case.
During the years 1873 and 1874 the corporation purchased from Lindauer, Levy & Co., and their successors, Lindauer Bros. & Co. of Chicago, certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Garrison v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Hawthorne v. CalefSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Merchants' Bank of New Haven v. BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Wayne County Civil Service Commission v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Merlo v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.