Legal Opinion
CREATIVE INTERNET ADVERTISING CORPORATION v. Yahoo! Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided December 9, 2009No. Civil Action 6:07cv354-JDLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Creative Internet Advertising Corporation’s (“CIAC”) Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Verdict (Doe. No. 286) (“Motion for Entry of Judgment”). This Motion was opposed by Defendant Yahoo! Inc.’s (“Yahoo”) Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 292). CIAC requests that the Court order Yahoo to pay an ongoing royalty rate of 23%. Yahoo responds that no ongoing royalty rate is necessary because it has taken steps to remove the infringing aspects of IMVironments, and that CIAC has not shown that a 23% ongoing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Merrill Hebert v. Lisle Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. Yahoo! Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
- Bianco v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
- VB Assets, LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024