Legal Opinion
Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. Yahoo! Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 1, 2010No. Civil Action 6:07cv354-JDLPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Creative Internet Advertising Corporation’s (“CIAC”) Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Verdict and Request for Enhanced Damages, a Finding That the Case is Exceptional, Attorney’s Fees, Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest, Supplemental Damages and Post-Verdict Royalty (Doc. No. 286) (“Motion”). Defendant Yahoo! Inc. (‘Yahoo”) has filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 292) (“Response”). CIAC also submitted a Reply in support of its Motion (Doc. No. 285). For the following…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Canon, Inc. v. Color Imaging, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- EAGLE VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance, Co., Ltd. v. CH Lighting Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
- Lee v. ACCESSORIES BY PEAKDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.