Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 7, 1917No. Gen. No. 6,422PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Grundy county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stoug-h, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

An automobile, owned by plaintiff and driven by his adult son, Frank Coyne, came into collision with a car carrying men and tools like a hand car, but run by a gasoline engine and called an autospeeder, at the crossing of a highway and the railway of defendant, called by the witnesses Bennett’s Crossing. Plaintiff brought this suit against defendant to recover damages for the injury done to the automobile, and, upon a trial, he had a verdict and a judgment for $276.76, from which the railway company appeals.

It is argued that the court erred in refusing a motion by defendant for a continuance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krieger v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. DillonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bale v. Chicago Junction Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Travis v. PiersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franklin & Pittsylvania Railway Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Cloyes v. PlaatjeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. Mueller v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Thompson v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. Emge v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API