Legal Opinion

Bale v. Chicago Junction Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal -from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Earlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The defendant in error recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error for the death-of his intestate, James Dunworth. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment and its record is now before us for review. A reversal is asked because the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence without which the accident would not have happened, the plaintiff’s counsel made improper statements in his argument, and the court gave an erroneous instruction.

The accident happened about two o’clock of a bright, clear day in February, at the crossing of Wallace street, running north and south, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krieger v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pienta v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Norman Klotz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. Northern Trust Co. v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kelly v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Miller v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API