Franklin & Pittsylvania Railway Co. v. Shoemaker
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Designating the parties as they were designated in the trial court, the defendant, a Virginia corporation, was chartered on the 13th day of July, 1922, and by its charter was authorized to operate its lines “with steam or any other kind of motive power.” The road itself, now nineteen miles long, lies wholly in Franklin county. Its motive power consists of a light freight engine and a gasoline power car. This locomotive, carrying a light freight train, is scheduled to make one trip a week and runs as an extra whenever there is any demand for it. The power car makes two trips a day and is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Southern Railway Co. v. Bryant's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Johnson's Adm'r v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hereford v. MeekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. LassiterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ClementsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- City of Danbury v. CorbettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- In re: WoodleySupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.