Legal Opinion
People v. Norman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1995PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
In each of these cases, the defendants were convicted of larceny after selling goods to customers, taking the customers’ money and then failing to deliver the promised goods. Their appeals from the judgments of conviction require us to revisit the specialized requirements for the crimes that were known as larceny by false promise and larceny by false pretenses before the adoption of the Penal Law.
*613I.
People v Norman
In 1989, according to the trial evidence, defendant entered into a one-year lease on an old sawmill in South Colton, New York, opened a business office…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BynumNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Ponnapula v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- People v. ChicoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. RosseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ponnapula v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.