Legal Opinion

People v. Delamota

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

Over a century ago, People v Ledwon (153 NY 10 [1897]) established that a criminal conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence if the only evidence of guilt is supplied by a witness who offers inherently contradictory testimony about the defendant’s culpability. The victim in this case consistently told the jury that defendant was the person who robbed him but his testimony conflicted with the testimony of other witnesses. We hold that the limited rule of Ledwon does not govern on these facts and the proof at trial was sufficient to support…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. People v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. KancharlaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In re Danielle B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. The People v. Hakim B. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. The People v. Jafari LamontNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API