Legal Opinion

Tate v. American General Life & Accident Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 31, 1995No. 3—94—0356PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

The petitioner, Gary Tate, appeals from the Illinois Human Rights Commission’s (Commission’s) order granting summary decision in favor of the respondent, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (American), on petitioner’s age discrimination claim. Petitioner raises two issues for our review: (1) whether he received due process, and (2) whether the decision of the Commission is against the manifest weight of the evidence. We affirm.

On March 28, 1991, petitioner filed a charge of discrimination against American with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (Department). Petitioner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bernier v. SchaeferIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Marinelli v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Cano v. Village of DoltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Munoz v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ress v. Office of the State ComptrollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Gardziella v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Wanless v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Tate v. AMER. GEN. LIFE & ACC. INS. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Gardziella v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API