Legal Opinion
Cano v. Village of Dolton
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 20, 1993No. 1-92-0003PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano
Petitioner Jimmy Cano seeks direct review of an order of the Illinois Human Rights Commission which granted a summary decision in favor of respondent Village of Dolton. We affirm.
On February 23, 1988, petitioner filed with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (DHR) a notarized charge of discrimination alleged to have been perpetrated by respondent Village of Dolton, Department of Public Works (Dolton). His complaint claimed that he was informed by letter on February 17, 1988, that his application for a position as a laborer in the Dolton department of public works had been rejected because…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Central City Education Ass'n v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Myers v. Health Specialists, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Wolf v. LiberisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Rotzoll v. Overhead Door Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Bloom Township High School v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. DiMucciAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Tate v. American General Life & Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.