Legal Opinion
Wanless v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 28, 1998No. 4-97-0480PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge
We are presented here with the issue of whether the Illinois Human Rights Commission (Commission) erred in dismissing petitioner’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction by determining that the petitioner was not an “employee” under the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS Ann. 5/1 — 101 et seq. (Michie 1994)). For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the Commission.
Frank Wanless appeals from a decision of the Illinois Human Rights Commission finding that it did not have jurisdiction over his claim of age discrimination against the Tremont Savings Bank when he was forced to leave the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Sam ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN SIGNAL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FIRST CATHOLIC SLOVAK LADIES ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Verlyn McGRAW and Mary E. McGraw, Appellants, v. WARREN COUNTY OIL COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Valley Mould & Iron Co. v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. Department of CorrectionsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Rozsavolgyi v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- Betts v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Boeving v. City of Collinsville, IllinoisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
- Mitchell v. Department of CorrectionsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.