Gardziella v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard
Plaintiff Sigfried Gardziella filed a pro se complaint in the trial court to obtain administrative review of a decision of the City of Chicago department of administrative hearings pursuant to the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 101 et seq. (West 2000)). Defendant City of Chicago department of buildings had obtained a default judgment of $19,550 on its complaint for building code violations on plaintiffs property, a two-unit residence. An administrative law officer (ALO) refused to set aside the default because plaintiffs motion to set aside the default was not filed within 21 days…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Page v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Daley v. License Appeal CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Swoope v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barry v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State PanelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. M.T.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Browning v. Advocate Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.