Legal Opinion

Gardziella v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 24, 2003No. 1-01-2866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard

Plaintiff Sigfried Gardziella filed a pro se complaint in the trial court to obtain administrative review of a decision of the City of Chicago department of administrative hearings pursuant to the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 101 et seq. (West 2000)). Defendant City of Chicago department of buildings had obtained a default judgment of $19,550 on its complaint for building code violations on plaintiffs property, a two-unit residence. An administrative law officer (ALO) refused to set aside the default because plaintiffs motion to set aside the default was not filed within 21 days…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Page v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Daley v. License Appeal CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Swoope v. Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barry v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Department of Central Management Services v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State PanelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. M.T.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Browning v. Advocate Health & Hospital Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API