Legal Opinion

United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, Defendants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1986No. 85-5110, 85-5112 and 85-5115PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.

Lynn Dale Bogart and Edward Elbert Wingender pled guilty to conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and to the unlawful use of a communications facility. Teodaro Risquez pled guilty to attempting to possess cocaine.

Bogart and Wingender contend that the government’s conduct was so outrageous that it violated their due process rights. The district court held an evidentiary hearing and rejected the defendants’ outrageous governmental conduct claim, but made no findings of fact. Bogart and Win-gender also argue that the district court, in denying their…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API