Legal Opinion

Carr v. Brawley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1912No. 2031PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Lincoln County; Roy Hoffman, Judge. Action by E. J. Brawley against E. W. Carr. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Brawley was plaintiff below and Carr was defendant. The defendant in error, E. J. Brawley, as plaintiff below, sued plaintiff in error, E. W. Carr, as defendant below, for the alleged conversion of a sum of money, alleged to have been the proceeds of a crop of cotton raised by a man named Wallace, and on which plaintiff held a mortgage.

It seems that Wallace raised some cotton. He gave two mortgages on it. Carr became the owner of the first mortgage by assignment. Brawley owned the second mortgage. Carr sued Wallace in replevin for the cotton under the first mortgage.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Brackett v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Great Western Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Waters v. Cass County BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Abbeville Live Stock Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Dodd-Lear Hardwood Lumber Co. v. GyrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Farmers' State Bank of Alva v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API