Abbeville Live Stock Co. v. Walden
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The action, by a mortgagee, is detinue for a mule, against the purchaser thereof from the mortgagor, who had sold it pursuant to the verbal instructions of the mortgagee.
There was conflict in the evidence as to the exact terms of the mortgagee’s consent to the sale; there is no conflict as to the fact that he so consented. The mortgage contained the provision:
“It is expressly agreed that none.of the property conveyed herein shall be disposed of by mortgagor without the consent in writing of mortgagee, or its assignee.”
A general rule of contracts is that stipulations solely for the benefit of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Formby v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Lowy v. RosengrantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Stringfellow v. IvieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Weatherwax v. HeflinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Norris v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Babbitt Bros. Trading Co. v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Messer v. Dupuy-Burke Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.