N.T. v. H.T.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.
*597*364INTRODUCTION
A wife sought a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against her husband for acts specifically violating the temporary restraining order (TRO) the trial court had issued against the husband eight months earlier. The court denied the DVRO on the ground that a technical violation of a TRO was not an act of domestic violence. We reverse and remand.
For purposes of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act, Family Code section 6200 et seq. (DVPA), abuse includes behaviors that were enjoined by a TRO, and is not limited to acts inflicting physical injury. ( Fam. Code, § 6203.) (All…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nakamura v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lister v. Bowen CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Caldwell v. CoppolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bailey v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- In re A.P.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- K.L. v. R.H.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Marriage of F.M. & M.M.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Marriage of Miles CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.