In Re Marriage of Van Hook
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this published portion of our opinion, we hold that, pursuant to Civil Code sections 4351 and 4359 and Code of Civil Procedure section 527, a trial court may enter a preliminary injunction restraining a judgment creditor of one spouse from executing on community property involved in a marital dissolution proceeding. However, on granting the injunction, the court must require an undertaking to protect the interest of the judgment creditor pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 529.
Factual and Procedural History
Petitioner Evelyn Marie Van Hook (hereafter Evelyn) and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stroh v. Midway Restaurant Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Efstratis v. First Northern Bank of DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Caldwell v. CoppolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mangini v. J.G. Durand InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Guasch v. GuaschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.