Legal Opinion
Jackson v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 15, 1961No. 38,143, 38,144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, have brought these actions to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Elaine Jackson, and for consequential damages sustained by Maurice Jackson, as the result of an accident caused by a washout in one of defendant’s streets. Following verdicts in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The evidence discloses that at the time of the accident, on June 2, 1958, at approximately 8 o’clock in the morning, Mrs. Jackson was driving her husband’s car from her home on Pennsylvania Avenue in St.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Mix v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Fleming v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Brittain v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kopveiler v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987