Legal Opinion

Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1987No. C5-86-2212, C7-87-357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Sauk Rapids appeals from denial of its motion for a new trial and from a judgment that the city was negligent in failing to remedy an inadequacy in its storm sewer system, resulting in damage to David Cha-bot’s house. Chabot appeals the trial court’s computation of pre-verdict interest. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

David Chabot purchased a house from Wilbert Landwehr in early 1983. The house had been built by Landwehr across the street from a holding pond used and maintained by Sauk Rapids as part of its storm sewer drainage system. On June 25 and 26, 1983,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Andrade v. EllefsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Hansen v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Chabot v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API