Legal Opinion
ARMSTRONG PUMP, INC. v. Hartman
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 7, 2010No. 10-CV-446SPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, commenced on May 28, 2010, Plaintiff Armstrong Pump, Inc. (“Armstrong”) is suing Defendant Hartman, the owner of three patents to which Armstrong has a license, for breach of contract and anticipatory breach of contract related to its intended assignment of the three patents and a pending patent application to Defendant Optimum Energy. Optimum Energy is sued for tortious interference with contract. The Court previously concluded that personal jurisdiction exists over both Defendants and that venue in this…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berardi v. BerardiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023