Whisenhunt v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. MATTHEWS, Justice.
In Copelin v. State, 659 P.2d 1206 (Alaska 1983), we held that a person arrested for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated has a right to consult a lawyer before being required to decide whether to submit to a breathalyzer test. We also held that if this right is violated then the test results should be suppressed in an ensuing criminal prosecution. 1 The question here is whether the result of a test secured in violation of the right to counsel should be excluded in a civil license revocation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. NeitzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.