State v. Sears
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This petition for review questions whether illegally obtained evidence may be used in a probation revocation proceeding. The state does not dispute for purposes of this review that the evidence in question was the fruit of an illegal search and seizure.
*908Respondent Timothy Sears was placed on probation on April 30, 1973, after having pleaded guilty to the charge of accessory after the fact to the crime of burglary.1 The court prescribed the usual general conditions of probation, including the condition that Sears comply with all municipal, state and federal laws and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.