Legal Opinion
Livers v. Wu
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 30, 1998No. 96 C 5333PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bernard Livers and his wife Rhonda Livers bring this action again Mogo, Inc. (“Mogo”), the Bernard’s former employer. Also named as defendants are Ming Wu (“Wu”), Mogo’s president, and Ken Kuo (“Kuo”). All three defendants are fiduciaries of Mogo’s pension plan. Count I is an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.,' claim, that defendants breached their duties as ERISA fiduciaries by converting to their own purposes funds that should have been deposited in Bernard’s retirement plan. Count II is a…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Pace v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Mann v. City of Chula VistaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020