Legal Opinion

People v. Hewlett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel is conclusory and without support in the record. Defendant fails to identify any theory of defense that was ignored or any particular witness that should have been called (see, People v Benn, 68 NY2d 941, 942). The record demonstrates that defense counsel vigorously cross-examined the People’s witnesses and delivered opening and closing statements that were entirely consistent with defendant’s alibi defense (see, People v Hood, 62…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BennNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. HoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. BattenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. LeslieNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. GattoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API