Legal Opinion
People v. Jones
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 1981PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The objection to the charge concerning reasonable doubt was not preserved (People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467), nor are the errors considered by the Appellate Division available for our review (People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26; People v Johnson, 47 NY2d 124; People v Williams, 46 NY2d 1070).
Though the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can be made for the first time before us (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137), a reading of the record, without more, does not bear out the claim that defendant did not have meaningful…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by56 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Waterhouse v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- People v. AngelakosNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Waterhouse v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.