Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1998No. S-96-373PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Appellant, Thomas McAllister, an employee of appellee the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services (Department), was terminated pursuant to Department administrative regulation No. 112.6, Employee Discipline, rule C-V006 - Conduct Inappropriate for a State Employee. McAllister contends that his termination did not comport with due process. Specifically, McAllister asserts that regulation No. 112.6 prescribes a penalty and therefore is a “rule or regulation” within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which requires that such rules or regulations must be filed with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Rossie v. State Rev. Dept.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Gausman v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dannehl v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Interest of Natasha H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mandolfo v. ChudyNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Nelson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API