Legal Opinion

Mandolfo v. Chudy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1998No. S-96-557PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

STATEMENT OF CASE

This is an action by Joseph Mandolfo and Nancy Mandolfo, two of six coguarantors of a $325,000 promissory note, who purchased an assignment of the note and guaranty, and commenced suit against John P. Chudy, one of the other four coguarantors, to recover the entire principal balance of the note and accrued interest.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The issues in this case present questions of law, in connection with which an appellate court reaches a conclusion independent of the lower court’s ruling. McAllister v. Department of Corr. Servs., ante p. 910, 573 N.W.2d 143 (1998); Brams Ltd. v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. FIRST NAT. BANK IN MITCHELL v. BolzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Collins v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Guzman v. BarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Estate of Frantz v. PageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Estate of Nelms, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  2. State v. WoodsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folgers Architects Ltd. v. KernsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Pirani v. Baharia (In Re Pirani)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Carpenter v. CullanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API