Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1999No. S-97-1175PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hendry, C J.

INTRODUCTION

Subsequent to the approval of a proposed development by the Omaha City Council, a group of real property owners, Robert Nelson et al. (Homeowners), possessing land abutting and around the proposed development, filed a petition for injunctive relief and declaratory judgment against the City of Omaha. Homeowners alleged that the proposed development was a “Major Amendment” to a planned unit overlay district (PUD) originally approved by the Omaha City Council in 1984 and, therefore, required a supermajority vote of the city council for approval, rather than the 4-to-3…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bohl v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Village of Winside v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Landon v. PettijohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Barnett v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lackman v. RousselleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Estate of KrumwiedeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Daniels v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kant v. AltayarNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. 780 L.L.C. v. DiPrimaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API