Legal Opinion

Blasser v. Cass

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1958No. A-6413PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Norvell

A. B. Cass, Jr., a licensed real estate dealer, brought this action against Max and Sam Blasser to recover commissions upon renewal leases covering property which the Blassers had purchased from Louis Meyer. The agreement relied upon by Cass was not signed by the Blassers 1 but was executed by Meyer prior to the time he conveyed the property to the Blassers. The trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals held that the Blassers were liable for the renewal commissions on the theory that the agreement relating thereto and contained in the contract between Meyer and Cass was “a covnant running…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kokernot v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Lakewood Heights Co. v. McCuistionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Montgomery v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Eddy and Cross, Receivers v. HinnantTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Blasser v. CassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wayne Harwell Properties v. Pan American Logistics Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  3. Foster v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Collum v. NeuhoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Raul Rosales v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API